I'm stoked that the ABA took the initiative to take advantage of the unlimited Class 5 UCI races. This will help the USA rack up some points towards Olympic qualification. Seemingly in conjunction with the ABA schedule being released the UCI calendar was also updated.
It shows Guthrie, Oldsmar, and Albuquerque as being UCI Class 4 (International Classic) races; with the Abbotsford, Canada race being the fourth "Classic" (each continent is only allowed 4 Classics, but an unlimited number of Class 5 races).
The one thing I've learned in 26+ years of racing is that the schedule will never please everyone. The ABA is a business. My guess is that the ABA schedules nationals for three reasons:
1. To capture the highest possible rider count/entry fees (6 West Coast races).
2. To strategically get a stronger foothold in a good market where they lack market share (2 Florida races + Alabama).
3. To reward loyalty or entice a new track.
No state is "entitled" to a certain number of nationals. Texas used to always have three nationals (DFW, El Paso, and Houston). As the moto counts gradually went down year after year two of those nationals dissapeared. Minnesota has had a national for as many years as I can remember, so maybe it was Wisconsin's turn; especially if there is a good growth potential there, or a very good program that deserves a national. Do you really think that all of the MN ABA tracks should switch to NBL, because WI got the national this year? Really? I bet the moto count will be about the same and I'm sure it will be back in MN next year. I would be willing to bet that if the NBL were to ever go away the ABA would definitely schedule more nationals on the East coast and the northeast to service the huge market in those areas.
Don't take it so personally; it's a business. If you think that are making decisions in a vacuum; you're wrong.

