QUOTE (MikeCarruth @ Oct 27 2008, 02:01 PM)

Just got my sub in the mail, and checked out the 30 year retrospective. Pretty cool stuff, but a few timeline faux pas:
Pg 53: They say "BMX Bikes go head to head with motorcycles: surprise, they're faster"
Actually: The feature was "Who's RADDER?" And the spread was one of the first glimpses into what would become FMX. *Point given to the fact that they use that "they're faster" thread throughout the timeline, but for accuracy sake, just seemed weird."
Pg 53: Top right, they say that Redline is "30 years young" in 2008
Actually: Redline is 35 in 2009, as stated in the ad on pages 6 and 7 of that issue
Pg 54: They say that in "1988: Eliot and ET pedaled into the spotlight aboard a Kuwahara"
Actually: ET was released in 1982
I hate when people post hyper-critical stuff like this (so, I'll bash myself in the head with a roll of quarters in a minute here), but I just wish they did more with the amazing opportunity of the 30 year anniversary. With the best, and most complete BMX archive in existence (covering racing, freestyle and product for all of the 30 year history), there is a real gem of a coffee table book sitting in those file cabinets.
Anyway, despite the above, great job on the issue (if anyone from the staff reading)!
Best,
M
I don't think you are being hyper critical at all. I find it important to have an accurate history of the sport. Other established sports have it why not BMX? I think there should be an official or at least highly regarded source for the History of BMX from 1969 to right up to this very second. I would like to see something like
The Baseball Almanac in BMX with the records of every sanctioning body and their results for every year on at least the national and regional level if not all the way to the district level including every race ever held on the local level going back to the days of B.U.M.S and Mackler's track. I just hope that the ABA and NBL have their records and the records they inherited from the USBA and the NBA respectively (and the NEBA, NPSA, IBMX, UBR, SDBMXA and all of the other sanctioning bodies that they absorbed) not to forget about the IBMXF and FIAC. That would be great and would further demonstrate the BMX is a serious sport (if being in the Olympics isn't proof enough). Every sport has to know its history.
It is incredible that the writers of that
BMX Plus! retrospective who I would guess would have the original magazines at their disposal would get those facts wrong. I was heart sick when it was reported a few months ago that Challenge Publishing got rid of its stock of
Super BMX magazines. We are losing the history of the sport. Having magazines in private collections isn't good enough. The kids and adults who are curious about them don't have access to them so they will be ignorant of the past and at best will get flawed tellings of it like that
BMX Plus! article. Can you image the general press given that article as a thumbnail primer of the history of the sport?
Lets not get in a situation where some 10 expert will say "Stu who?" and it will
not be joking! I don't want to read somewhere in
BMX Plus! or anywhere else 11 years from now when BMX is 50 years old that Greg Hill was No.1 pro in the NBA in 1986 or that Eddy and Mike King were both on Diamondback or something just as ridiculous.
Oldtimer1980s