QUOTE (seracingman @ Mar 31 2008, 09:13 PM)

How come you just did not replace the seat mast ?
Fair enough question.
Primarily,
"The objective is to cheat the system, and not have to strip chrome, replace tubing, and re-chrome everything."There are a few good reasons for not replacing the seat mast. Although it should be noted, that if a seat tube replacement was to be done, a lot of other issues could be repaired at the same time, and the frame could be brought back to like new cosmetic condition.
1. It's not my bike.
2. Cost effectiveness.
3. It is already chrome plated. Stripping chrome is a tricky and risky process with any bike, however, since Stings have thin wall tubing that has been stretched even thinner, ovalized, and double butted, it is
extra risky.
They are also brazed, so when you strip one of its chrome, you risk other damage when stripping it. The chemical they use for stripping chrome is very nasty, and it eats brass like candy (if it can eat Chromium and Nickel, that makes brass a quick snack for it.) . Since the frames are brazed, you will lose a bunch of the original welds during stripping even if the plater is careful, and baby sits it vigilantly while stripping it. If stripped poorly, you may lose a lot of the original welds, (or ALL of it) and have to re-weld the whole thing just to have enough build up left on it. Then you would have to re-shape, and re-polish
all the welds, just as they did in the Paramount room BITD. So much for simple striping and plating.
The up side of this, is that issues like the head tube crack, is in the brazed weld, so that could be fixed at that point.
4. As stated, Stings are Tri-ovalized, which means that 3 of the tubes have been "ovalized" or stretched to increase weld area and strength, as well as double butted tubing. One of the ovalized tubes being
the seat tube. The lower third of the seat tube is ovalized and double butted. This is not an easy thing to duplicate without the original tubing fabrication tooling. This is no simple straight seat post tube here, like on most bikes.
This is your frame BTW, not one of mine. Supervisor Dakota says it looks OK too.

So this is another view of the Brige City challenge repair.
Note substantial ovalizing and location of double butted area.

Therefore, you would want to splice in a seat tube section about half way up, above the ovalized section, and above the double butted section too. Once you do this, you would have an ugly TIG weld you need to deal with. It would need to be filed off, sanded and polished, and it would have to be very straight and neat to not show after plating. This can be done, but polishing and blending this in, would be a substantial task. (again $$$$, and time)
And of course now you would have one tube with
no chrome plating at all. (no blending that with silver solder, lol) So you are committed to either
painting it, or stripping it, and re-plating the whole thing.
This is why I always say; "It's easier to chrome plate a painted frame, and to paint a chromed frame". In either case, the chrome and nickel does not need to be stripped, which is the big deal.
So, I guess those are the reasons. He wanted to fix what was there (this started in another thread BTW) , without getting into an overly expensive re-build of the whole frame.
Anything can be done, but how much do you want to spend on it?
As I see it, here is how it would go down. You would need to strip the chrome off of it first ($100, and some begging of the plater, since it's brazed, and he won't want to have anything to do with it.). Then you would need to remove the welds at the seat mast, and cut the seat tube down. Then TIG weld in a spliced section and re-braze the mast together. Then grind, file, sand, shape, and polish out the TIG weld as well as the new brazing, (and hope there is no lumps on the inside of the tubing to deal with so the seat post can go in)($100 if you are lucky). Then you would need to fix all dents, cracks, and lost brazing on the entire frame, and grind, sand, and polish all of that out (paying someone to do it? $100 easy). Then you would need to polish it all and chrome plate it ($250 or more). Then put real decals on it ($200+). Jobbed out, with decals, $750 easy.
I could do it. But, personally, I still wouldn't, unless it had substantial sentimental value. It would easily cost double what I paid for my mint original chrome Sting.
So it was a sentimental save. It has history, and this just adds more history to it.

.
And if he ever wants to take it to the next level, it can still be done. The solder can come off, and tubes can still be spliced, but it will be time to get out the checkbook at that point.
Personally, If
I wanted a flawless chrome Sting, I'd buy a painted one with some minor issues (like the one I bought from Sprinter, lol) , strip the damaged paint, polish it, and plate it to perfection, and it would still cost more that way. (I've done just that, so I am certain of it). But then I'd have a flawless "Show Plated Sting", at a more reasonable cost. (I have one on my wall like that, lol)
And you can see how if you really want to, you can finish what the Paramount boys started when polishing the welds before plating, and you can make them reallllly nice.

( I couldn't resist pulling this shot from the TGIF thread with my [yes it's glued on and fake, and was done for a joke, so don't beat me up, lol] mount screw for hanging it on the wall. The welds were all sweet, to varying degrees on the Stings, depending on who welded it, and who polished them, and what day of the week it was. You can compare the factory weld above to my handy work on one of mine here. Proving there is always room for a little tweaking towards perfection...lol.
(this one is one of mine, which I show chromed) (same tri-oval re-pop sticker that I just gave away though!, lol)

But the stripping chrome and repairing it, all in one deal, is not a cheap way to go, unless you have the skills and time to do it all yourself, and REALLLLLLY want YOUR bike done right at ANY cost.
There is the aircraft maintenance side of me that says, "any repair should be as good or better than new, and cost is no object". Then there is the realist in me that says, "it's an old broken down kids bike, and it's not worthy of any repairs". Then there is the pragmatist in me that says, "let's find a way to bring this sentimental and very cool item back the best way possible, that is cost effective, realistic, and makes the best of what you've got." ....The pragmatist in me usually wins.
So, that's my thoughts on it. The rest you'd have to get from him.

BTW, thanks for the heartfelt props guys.