QUOTE (Cash Matthews @ Mar 15 2007, 09:30 PM)

I still think he is innocent. Here is something from his site:
I am an avid cyclist and currently live in
Philadelphia. On the local npr show last month, the
most prominent performance enhancing drug specialist
was being interviewed. He has been doing research on
the topic at the University level for 30 years and has
fought off consistent recruitment efforts by European
cycling teams and doctors. He presented logical,
straight forward, scientific evidence why Floyd could
NOT have cheated; he stated, with regard to the Landis
case, two important exonerating FACTS:
1) If you test negative for testosterone one day and
positive the next and the following day, negative
again, this is IMPOSSIBLE b/c it takes months for
testosterone to leave your system. Why is landis
fighting w/ lawyers when he should rather present this
easy, logical, and scientific exonerating FACT?!
2) One would never use testosterone to go fast one
day. Testosterone is ONLY used during training to
improve recovery times. Again, Why is landis fighting
w/ lawyers when he should rather present this easy,
logical, and scientific exonerating FACT?!
Please please pass this info on to Floyd, his story is
breaking my heart. The callers to the show said their
mind about him had completely changed in light of the
most prominent expert in the field stating logically
sound reasons why FLoyd could not have cheated. Why,
w/ this medical info out there, is he not yet exonerated???!!!
Rob in Maryland Says:
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHahahahahahahahaha!!!
What do you think now, Cash?!!!
I believe him regarding his implications of other riders; the thought of any of them doping would not surprise me at all. The fact that Floyd denied it and wasted 2 mill defending his lies removes any credibility to what he is currently saying. It will not take much for Lance's imminent smear campaign to get traction. Regardless, Floyd is a D-bag and this is just another black eye to road cycling:
In a bizarre twist to a long-running saga about doping in sports, cyclist
Floyd Landis has finally admitted to using performance-enhancing drugs.
He also has accused former teammate
Lance Armstrong of using drugs to win his seven Tour de France titles.
Landis' 2006 victory in the Tour de France was nullified by a positive test for synthetic testosterone and set off a series of legal skirmishes.
He
told ESPN.com he used EPO, testosterone, HGH and also had frequent blood transfusions along with using female hormones.
Landis has sent a series of e-mails to cycling officials detailing the drug use, according to ESPN and other news outlets.
"I want to clear my conscience," Landis told ESPN. "I don't want to be part of the problem anymore."
He added that:
"I don't feel guilty at all about having doped. I did what I did because that's what we (cyclists) did and it was a choice I had to make after 10 years or 12 years of hard work to get there; and that was a decision I had to make to make the next step. My choices were, do it and see if I can win, or don't do it and I tell people I just don't want to do that, and I decided to do it."
Armstrong didn't immediately respond to the allegations, according to the
Wall Street Journal, which reported that, in the e-mails, Landis accused Armstrong.
The
New York Times says one cycling official who has received Landis' e-mails explained that Landis said his drug use started as a member of the U.S. Postal team in 2002. That team was led by Armstrong.
Landis' e-mails allege that U.S. Postal Team manager
Johan Bruyneel introduced Landis to the use of steroid patches, blood doping and human growth hormone. The
Times did not name the cycling official, who cited ongoing investigations, including by federal authorities, into the content of the emails.
Other cyclists named in the emails, according to the
Times, were current U.S. road racing national champion
George Hincapie, three-time Tour of California champion
Levi Leipheimer and five-time U.S. time trial champion
David Zabriskie.Landis told ESPN.com that he has no documentation to prove most of his claims.
Link