Dave Muggleston
Oct 20 2006, 03:41 AM
If you take NOS hubs, spokes, nipples and rims, and have them assembled into wheels, are the wheels NOS? I say "no" but I'm curious what the prevailing opinion is.
redlinenz
Oct 20 2006, 03:46 AM
I would say no, but they are all NOS Parts that make one item so it would maybe be a NOS Wheelset as it was made up at the shop.
My 2 cents
DansHaros
Oct 20 2006, 06:14 AM
I think the general opinion here is that it wouldn't be, but I think as long as it isn't mounted to a bike it should be. IMHO.
Dan
KOSY-MOTO
Oct 20 2006, 06:21 AM
WELL.. here's a complete NOS set of wheels.. NEW OLD SCHOOL never been mounted on a bike!

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOS!!
KOSY-MOTO
Oct 20 2006, 06:23 AM
ooops!! NEW OLD STOCK! not NEW OLD SCHOOL!! what was I thinking!! hehehehe
Gnuchoice
Oct 20 2006, 06:38 AM
The whole NOS wheel thing scares me, because there is a big difference between a wheel laced by a professional and a wheel laced by a hobbiest.
sprinter
Oct 20 2006, 07:40 AM
quote:
The whole NOS wheel thing scares me, because there is a big difference between a wheel laced by a professional and a wheel laced by a hobbiest.
That's a pretty broad statement. Depends on the hobbyist maybe. I've been lacing all of my wheels since I was 12 years old. I've never worked at a shop so I guess I am just a hobbyist...
I've seen some pretty crappy shops, and I've known some truly passionate hobbyists... For my money, I'll go with a "hobbyist" that cares about their hobby, over any "professional" that is just doing their job and making a paycheck...
All "hobbyists" and "professionals" are not the same. I guarantee that if you put one of my wheels up beside "professional" built wheels, you wouldn't be able to tell which was which. - Tim
sprinter
Oct 20 2006, 07:54 AM
P.S. The pieces are only NOS until "used". Lacing them does not make them used IMO. There is no bearing wear, no brake marks etc... They are still NEW, they are still OLD STOCK, until they are used.
You can build a complete bike using all NOS parts, and if the bike is never ridden, there is no wear on any of the parts, it's a NOS bike.
There will be a lot of debate on this I am sure, but that's my 2 cents.
illmatic
Oct 20 2006, 08:22 AM
i wall them nos not like some people selling part that have been restored and want to call them nos so the best dicription would be true nos never used never mounted is true nos if this the case with your rims then they are true nos nice st of wheels by the way
KOSY-MOTO
Oct 20 2006, 08:38 AM
WELL these are NOS laced by a pro! .... these will go on a 24' cruiser once I find all my NOS parts THEN I will ride it!! LIKE ALL BIKES are ment to be!!!
KOSY-MOTO
Oct 20 2006, 08:40 AM
..... oh till then those wheels will STAY NOS!! and hang off my wall.... that's the fun of NOS-MINT!!!!!!
[ October 20, 2006, 10:46 AM: Message edited by: osamaie ]
TIM
Oct 20 2006, 10:11 AM
A wheelset built with all NOS parts is not an NOS wheelset.
a new old stock wheelset would be just that - a wheelset built bitd and never used.
proof is in the pudding. NOS parts built into a wheel have been used. they do have wear. take the wheels back apart, and the individual parts are no longer NOS, because they have now been used and show wear (especially the hubs).
AtariAger
Oct 20 2006, 03:40 PM
spike
Oct 20 2006, 04:11 PM
Nope, NOS spokes hubs etc built up wouldn't be NOS wheels, just like ya can't build a survivor outta old parts.
rickcool
Oct 20 2006, 04:17 PM
Time is the issue here. I agree I think they are NOS until they are used. What difference does it make if they were laced 25 years ago or 25 minutes ago. If NOS parts were used to assemble the wheels then I would consider them to be NOS wheels. Besides the parts don't know how to tell time.
sprinter
Oct 20 2006, 04:23 PM
quote:
a new old stock wheelset would be just that - a wheelset built bitd and never used.
proof is in the pudding. NOS parts built into a wheel have been used. they do have wear. take the wheels back apart, and the individual parts are no longer NOS, because they have now been used and show wear (especially the hubs).
I can't win this argument, but here goes...
If you have 2 sets of rims, 2 complete sets of spokes, and 2 sets of hubs all made in 1979. I laced one set in 1979, and I lace the other set in 2006, how can they be different? Physically, tell me what's the difference? Same parts, same vintage, same wheel builder, the only variance being the time they were built. They have to be the same, if one set is not NOS then the other set cannot be.
spike
Oct 20 2006, 04:27 PM
Splittin' hairs but I see yer point......I think it's factory versus shop made.
TIM
Oct 20 2006, 04:47 PM
an NOS wheel would be a wheel built bitd at the factory, or, say, an AJ wheel built by Canoga Bike Shop and sold as "AJ Wheels". the wheel, as a complete unit, would by definition be New OLD STOCK.
anything else, is just a wheel, but not NOS. the "S" part of NOS, stock, signifies something from a manufacturer, not something built in your garage.
[ October 20, 2006, 06:51 PM: Message edited by: TIM ]
spike
Oct 20 2006, 04:49 PM
Harumph, harumph...er exactly
TIM
Oct 20 2006, 04:50 PM
example: you buy an NOS Motomag II, in the box. you decide you prefer Shimano MX coaster brakes over the Bendix 76 brake in the wheel. so you swap out an NOS Shimano MX brake for the Bendix. It's no longer an NOS wheel, because you have changed the factory configuration of that particular wheel.
[ October 20, 2006, 06:50 PM: Message edited by: TIM ]
rickcool
Oct 20 2006, 04:50 PM
Time: a non-spatial continuum of irreversable succession. LOL
I agree with you sprinter.....point well made.
rickcool
Oct 20 2006, 05:00 PM
Yes, but again parts don't know when they were assembled. As the point was made above, some parts were factory assembled,some were done by bike shops and still others were done by hobbyists. How does that change the fact that they are all old parts assembled a some point in their existance? If I built a 1965 Corvette with all NOS parts out of the box in 2006, does that make the Corvette a 2006 model ? I can see the point of factory assembled being a point here but it is the parts here that we are talking about not the assembly point.
eastcoaststeve
Oct 20 2006, 05:26 PM
Interesting read on NOS...substitute the word "bike" for "tubes" and it is a relevant read.
http://www.audiotubes.com/nos.htm
TIM
Oct 20 2006, 05:43 PM
quote:
If I built a 1965 Corvette with all NOS parts out of the box in 2006, does that make the Corvette a 2006 model ?
nope. but it doesn't make it an NOS 1965 Corvette either. and that is the point. NOS parts don't make an NOS whole. a 1965 Corvette that was assembled on the Chevy assembly line and pulled into the Chevy storage barn would be NOS. a 1965 Corvette you built in 2006 out of NOS parts would not be an NOS Chevy Corvette.
the NOS Schwinn Sting i once owned, assembled at Schwinn's factory, is not the same as a Schwinn Sting i could assemble completely of NOS parts.
raybeard
Oct 20 2006, 06:45 PM
osamaie, what brand are those hubs?
Ted Carl
Oct 20 2006, 06:54 PM
New. Not used condition.
Old. 1980
Stock. merchandise on a shelf.
Hubs NOS, Spokes NOS, Rims NOS. Wheels are still NOS.
The only difference is the facts. They are laced wheels made from NOS parts. They are still NOS.
If you want an unlaced NOS hub then you dont want these.
If you unlace them, they can easily be described as NOS hubs, that were previously laced into wheels.
They are still NOS, but their condition is not as good as never laced.
It's all metaphysical drivel. It still boils down to an accurate description of the item when buying and selling them.
But clearly, IMO they still fit the 3 words; New, Old, and Stock. They just need further descripton.
NOS previously laced and shown.
NOS never laced.
NOS Ridden only at rockford bike shows.
NOS New In Box
NOS Sealed package
NOS Shelf wear
NOS Dropped on concrete floor by moron
As long as you know what you are getting, who cares?
Ted Carl
Oct 20 2006, 06:57 PM
BTW, to prove the metaphysical nature of this topic.
Nothing here at VBMX is NOS. Because nothing is really old.
Define Old......
Pragmatics vs. metaphysics.
raybeard
Oct 20 2006, 06:57 PM
Any hub taken out of a wheel is NOT NOS.
raybeard
Oct 20 2006, 07:03 PM
Ted you forgot the following
NOS, used very hard for 5 years (20+ years ago), damaged many times during that period, rebuilt when damaged, stored in a damp basement for the past 20 years as the design was no longer cool at the track after 5 years, rediscovered last week, and refinished last week, decals from a reliable source via ebay
sprinter
Oct 20 2006, 07:09 PM
quote:
anything else, is just a wheel, but not NOS. the "S" part of NOS, stock, signifies something from a manufacturer, not something built in your garage.
So then... Same scenario I described above, I have all the NOS parts from 1979 to build two sets of wheels. In 1979 I take enough parts to build one set of wheels to a shop. They assemble the wheels. Now these wheels were built in a shop, not my garage, so now they are NOS wheels.
Now it's 2006 and I need the second set of wheels built. I unbox all the parts take them to the SAME shop, and by a miracle the SAME wheel builder still happens to be working there, and builds my wheels once again in a shop... yet now they are NOT NOS?
And for your "stock" argument... let's say that I bought the rims, spokes, and hubs from that very same shop in 1979, so they HAD been stock parts.
sprinter
Oct 20 2006, 07:16 PM
Or better yet, in 1979 I had the shop build one set of wheels, and purchased them complete. At the same time I bought 2 rims, a pair of hubs, and 72 spokes and nipples, all parts identical to the parts in my new wheels, same vintage, manufacturer, color etc...
Now it's 2006 I take these parts that had been "stock" back to the same shop, have the same wheel builder build them as my original set, using identical parts...
Are the 2006 wheels, sold as stock parts by the same shop, laced in the same shop, by the same wheel builder that has built all their wheels for the past 30 years... Are they NOS?
I can't see how the only variable that is different between the two, the dates they were laced, can make something NOS or not.
raybeard
Oct 20 2006, 07:21 PM
Sprinter, some will argue that once you build the wheels wether it be in 1979 or 2006 the PARTS that you bought are no longer NOS.
After assemblying the wheel components in 1979 could you have returned the parts as new?
Curt
Oct 20 2006, 08:24 PM
As long as we are splitting hairs
How about this angle on Survivor VS Build.
If you have all of your old race bikes, some complete and some parted, and you reassemble one of your bikes the way it was BITD with all the same parts that you had then, is it a:
1. A survivor
2. A re assembled survivor.
3. A survivor build.
4. A ???
Or does a survivor have to be as it was since 1979 never taken apart, even for cleaning or maintenence.
dayride
Oct 20 2006, 08:43 PM
So only if the factory put the wheel together could it only be considered New Old Stock?
My personal belief is that as long as it has not been mounted it is still NOS. So that means there is no such thing as NOS only mounted once on a show bike.
I have a question for Tim. How do you know that Sting was put together at the factory? I always thought most companies sent their bikes out unassembled at least no wheels or pedals and the final touches were done in the shop.
DMG
Oct 20 2006, 09:42 PM
If it doesn't have packaging is it NOS?
Mint NOS?
NOS with shelf wear?
NOS but has minor scratches from kicking around the shop?
NOS mounted on a show bike?
NOS out of package for picture?
Blah blah blah blah......................
Semantics:
1. Linguistics.
a. the study of meaning.
b. the study of linguistic development by classifying and examining changes in meaning and form.
2. Also called significs. the branch of semiotics dealing with the relations between signs and what they denote.
3. the meaning, or an interpretation of the meaning, of a word, sign, sentence, etc.: Let's not argue about semantics.
In linguistics, semantics is the subfield that is devoted to the study of meaning, as borne on the syntactic levels of words, phrases, sentences, and sometimes larger units of discourse, generically referred to as texts. As with any empirical science, semantics involves the interplay of concrete data with theoretical concepts, and specializations have developed that focus on different parts of that interaction, for example, the semantics of natural languages and formal languages, respectively.
TIM
Oct 20 2006, 09:46 PM
you can toss out "what ifs" all you want. the one thing in common is you're all trying to widen the definition of New Old Stock to meet your needs. we all know deep down what NOS means.
once you build a wheel, none of the parts are NOS any longer. they are used. the wheel, being a new build, is not NOS. it wasn't a wheel until you built it 4 days ago.
[ October 21, 2006, 12:01 AM: Message edited by: TIM ]
KOSY-MOTO
Oct 20 2006, 09:55 PM
WELL once a set of wheels are on a bike how can they become NOS?.. AS i showed you my NOS wheels.. that never have been mounted or USED.. (check hubs) NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSS!!
Hey Timbo.. can you show us where you get your info from?.. is it from a book that you have created?.. hehehe.. or it from the re-pop book that you keep quoting from? hahahaha
OSAMA
TIM
Oct 20 2006, 10:00 PM
KOSY-MOTO
Oct 20 2006, 10:00 PM
but what if....
TIM
Oct 20 2006, 10:03 PM
quote:
can you show us where you get your info from?..
common sense doesn't need a book.
once an item is used for its purpose and function, it is no longer NOS. a hub is not NOS any longer once it has been laced into a wheel. a rim is no longer NOS once a tire has been mounted to it. spokes are no longer NOS once they have been laced into a wheel.
mint condition? yes. NOS? no. condition is the more important factor anyway.
[ October 21, 2006, 12:07 AM: Message edited by: TIM ]
KOSY-MOTO
Oct 20 2006, 10:04 PM
they ain't NOS!! it was build for a show bike then taken off?.. so your rule of thumb book is wrong homie!!!
SantaAnaMassachusetts
Oct 20 2006, 10:08 PM
Tim nailed it. We all know what NOS means.
We just want to stretch its' definition when we are in selling/eBay marketing ourselves mode, or feeling guilty when taking NOS individual items and mounting/building them, knowing they will never be the same aout of the package no matter how great they look on our bikes.
KOSY-MOTO
Oct 20 2006, 10:09 PM
here you go Timbo - Item number: 280036984599 - NOS!!!
TIM
Oct 20 2006, 10:09 PM
you one of those guys, osamaie, who can't read an auction description and asks the seller dumb questions as a result? i clearly do NOT describe the wheels as NOS. i describe them, for those who cannot read english, this way: all the parts were NOS until the wheels were built. the wheels themselves are mint condition.
[ October 21, 2006, 12:14 AM: Message edited by: TIM ]
Randy
Oct 20 2006, 10:11 PM
from what I've read, nos has to be in the sack
KOSY-MOTO
Oct 20 2006, 10:17 PM
QUOTE this one!! looks like you need some NOS brain parts Timbo!!.. hehehe.. It's a real shame you have no sense of humour!! your a classic example!!
Do you ever ride your NOS-so build bikes? Makes us all wonder..
TIM
Oct 20 2006, 10:18 PM
and, yes, the issue bothers me because i have been sold "NOS" parts by many many people who seem to think the part remains "NOS" forever, even if they lace the hubs up, ride em for a year, then unlace them and put them back in the box.
NOS is a very narrow definition of a small (percentage-wise) number of parts floating around a hobby. i'd guess the term is misused with 50% or more of all "NOS" parts sold.
dayride
Oct 20 2006, 10:22 PM
So if I have a NOS stem I am thinking about putting on a build. I put some bars in it to see how they look together. Hand tighen the bolts, then take the bars back out, the stem is no longer NOS because I used it for its purpose and function? I know alot of guys do this when mocking up a build.
We can go on all night like this. I don't think anyone is trying to widen the definition to fit thier needs as much as some are trying to tighten the definition to fit their needs.
In the end it comes down to your opionion. If you think a set like the ones Tim posted are should be considered NOS then that's cool. If you don't that's cool too. If you post them for sale as NOS then those that think like you will be happy and may pay more. Those that don't think like you will not want to pay as much.
TIM
Oct 20 2006, 10:26 PM
it should not come down to opinion. i do not want to buy an "NOS" wheelset from Sprinter only to find he built them last week.
it is not "cool" to misrepresent stuff when you are selling it. as i said i have a big pile of you guys' "NOS" stuff. lots of it was more than a little used. should those sellers' opinions be respected?
[ October 21, 2006, 12:29 AM: Message edited by: TIM ]
Nighthawk
Oct 20 2006, 10:51 PM
I really cannot believe it has come to this where we are having issues over parts as if they were trading commodoties.
These are bikes. And bike parts. New, used, NOS, who cares, get over it. Bikes are made for riding. Even 'priceless' Ferrari 250 GTOs get wrung out on the racetracks still.